SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 86713

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Rohit Kapoor, J
Jarnail Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
CRWP No.6856 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Bikramjeet Singh Jatana
For the Respondents: Adeshwar Singh Pannu

A prisoner cannot be kept in detention once a valid bail order and release warrant have been issued, unless there is a specific, lawful order of arrest or remand pertaining to another case.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India and S. 528 of BNSS, 2023, seeking a writ of habeas corpus for the release of the detenue, who remained in custody despite the grant of regular bail and the issuance of release warrants by the trial court. The state contended that production warrants from a court in another jurisdiction justified the continued detention. The principal issue was whether the jail authorities could continue the incarceration of the detenue, notwithstanding the bail order and the absence of any valid arrest or remand order in the second case. Finding that the respondent could not produce any legal authority for the ongoing detention, the court determined that the incarceration was illegal. The petition is allowed and the authorities are directed to release the detenue immediately.

Table of Content
1. petition for habeas corpus upon failure to release despite bail order. (Para 1 , 2)
2. contentions regarding the legality of detention pending production warrants. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court mandate for immediate release due to illegal continued incarceration. (Para 7 , 8)

ROHIT KAPOOR, J. (Oral)

1. The instant petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 482 Cr.P.c.) praying for the issuance of a writ in the nature of habeas corpus for releasing the detenue namely Lakhvir Singh, who is the son of the petitioner and is alleged to be presently illegally detained in Central Jail, Bathinda.

2. Brief facts leading to the filing of the instant petition are that FIR No.99 dated 30.04.2026 has been registered against the detenue and another co--accused namely Sanjogpreet Singh, at Police Station Nathana, District Bathinda, under Section 18(c) of the NDPS Act and Section 25 of the Arms Act. Allegation is that 74 grams of opium and a .30 bore pistol (licensed weapon) were allegedly recovered from the detenue. The Special Court Bathinda allowed the regular bail of the detenue vide order dated 02.06.2026 (Annexure P-1). In compliance of the directions contained in the said order, bail bonds were furnished on behalf of the detenue which were accepted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bathinda and vide order dated 04.06.2026 the release warrants were directed to be issued immediately.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that despite the fact that the bail application of the detenue has been allowed and release warrants stand issued, yet, the jail authorities of Central Jail, Bathinda, have not released him and he is being kept in illegal custody. It is submitted that the reason for the same, as informed by the Jail Authorities is that they have received production warrants to produce the detenue before the Court of the learned Special Judge, West District, Tees Hazari, Delhi, on 05.06.2026 in connection with FIR No.24 of 2026, under Sections 18, 23, 25, 29 of the NDPS Act registered at Police Station Crime Branch, West Delhi. Submission is that the detenue continues to illegally languish in jail despite the fact that there are no order of his arrest or remand in any other case. It is further submitted that the detenue has now been informed that he is to be produced before the Court at Delhi on 08.06.2026. Arguing that in the absence of any legal grounds, the detenue cannot be illegally kept in custody any further, it is prayed that appropriate directions be issued to the jail authorities, Central Jail, Bathinda to immediately release the detenue.

4. Notice of motion.

5. On the asking of the Court, learned State counsel accepts notice and on instructions from Sh. Sachinmeet Singh, Assistant Superintendent, Central Jail, Bathinda, submits that the production warrants dated 01.06.2026, directing the jail authorities to produce the detenue before the court at Delhi on 05.06.2026, were received prior to the receiving of the release warrants. It is further submitted that the detenue has been produced before the Special Judge, Tees Hazari Court, on 05.06.2026, through video conferencing and it is submitted on oral instructions, that the detenue is required to be produced before the said court on 08.06.2026.

6. On a specific query by this court regarding the averment in the petition that there is no arrest or remand order against the detenue in any case, the learned State counsel is unable to deny the same.

7. In that view of the matter this court is of the considered opinion that any further incarceration of the detenue is wholly unwarranted and illegal. As a necessary consequence the instant petition is allowed and the Superintendent, Central Jail, Bathinda-respondent No.3 is directed to ensure the immediate release of the detenue from the District Jail, Bathinda.

8. The office is directed to communicate these orders to the Superi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top