Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sandeep Moudgil, J
Aasin – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. basis of application for anticipatory bail under relevant criminal statutes. (Para 1) |
| 2. judicial assessment of medical evidence and justification for adding severe charges late. (Para 3) |
| 3. court order granting bail subject to investigation cooperation and specific conditions. (Para 4) |
***
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL)
1. Prayer
The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 (438 Cr.P.C.) for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in F.I.R No. 153 dated 31.05.2022 Under Section 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 506, 452, later on added 307 in 2026 of IPC (191(B), 190, 115(2), 118, 117(2), 351(2), 333, 109 of BNS) registered at Police Station City Nuh district Nuh, (Haryana) (Annexure P-1).
2 Contention
On behalf of the petitioner
Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that the petitioners had already been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 24.05.2023. It is submitted that now, merely on account of a subsequent re-opinion, Section 307 IPC has been added by the police. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners have duly joined the investigation and nothing remains to be recovered from his possession. It has also been
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
