IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sandeep Moudgil, J
Baljinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of parole application facts and state's rejection grounds. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court evaluates humanitarian necessity versus public security concerns. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. granting conditional parole for specific duration. (Para 8 , 9) |
1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, especially a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 23.04.2025 (Annexure P-3) passed by respondent No.4- Commissioner-cum-District Deputy Magistrate, Bathinda, whereby the request for grant of 8 weeks parole has been rejected wrongly and illegally, thus the same needs to be set aside. Further a prayer has been made for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to release the petitioner on parole for a period of eight weeks under the provisions of the Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962, to enable him to meet and take care of his ailing mother, who is suffering from various ailments and requires his care, support, and assistance, in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.