Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sandeep Moudgil, J
Kapil – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. invoking section 482 of the bnss for anticipatory bail. (Para 1 , 1) |
| 2. parties argument regarding the necessity of custodial interrogation. (Para 2) |
| 3. grant of bail based on cooperation and sufficiency of existing evidence. (Para 3 , 4) |
1. Prayer
The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.52 dated 13.04.20266 under Sections 34 (3) (5) of BNS), 419 (319 of BNS), 420 (318 (4) of BNS), 467 (338 of BNS), 468 (336 (2) of BNS), 471 (340 (2) of BNS) of IPC registered at Police Station Gulha, District Kaithal, Haryana.
2. Contention
On behalf of the petitioner
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is contended that the petitioner is merely a neighbour of the co-accused, Sultan Singh, and had appended his signatures to the registry proceedings in good faith, without any knowledge of the alleged impersonation. It is further submitted that no recovery is to be effected from the petitioner and that the prosecution case is primarily founded on documentary evidence, which is already in the possession of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
