IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KRISHAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
1. Prayer
The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Section 482 of Bharatiya. Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Corresponding section 438 of code of criminal procedure code with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the event of his arrest in FIR No.0036, DATED 25/04/2026, Registered At Police Station Khanauri, District Sangrur, Under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 61(2) of BNS 2023 (Corresponding sections 420, 406, 406 of IPC 1860) (Annexure P-1).
2 Contention
On behalf of the petitioner
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case on the basis of an afterthought and concocted version of facts, which amounts to an abuse of the process of law. It is submitted that the alleged Will dated 07.03.2024 and the subsequent sale deeds dated 19.03.2024 were executed during the lifetime of Smt. Chando Devi, who admittedly remained alive till 25.11.2025 and never raised any objection, complaint, or challenge to the said documents during her lifetime, thereby prima facie reflecting her consent and validation of the said transactions. Learned counsel further submits that the dispute in qu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.