Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sandeep Moudgil, J
Sajan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background and submissions regarding anticipatory bail request. (Para 1 , 1 , 2) |
| 2. judicial assessment of evidence and relevance of criminal antecedents. (Para 3) |
| 3. granting conditional bail and outlining compliance requirements. (Para 4) |
1. Prayer
The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No. 128 dated 30.4.2026 U/s 110,115 and 351(2), BNS (308, 323 and 506 IPC) registered at Police Station: City Jagadhri Distt. Yamuna Nagar.
2 Contention
On behalf of the petitioner
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case as the complainant folds animosity against the petitioner because the wife of the complainant and petitioner were involved prior to marriage. He further submits that there is unexplained delay of 7 days in lodging the FIR as the alleged incident took place on 23.04.2026 and FIR was registered on 30.04.2026. It is further argued that the complainant has received simple injuries only and that too on non-vital parts, thus no offence under Sections 308 of IPC/110 BNS is made out. He undertakes on beha
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
