SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 86917

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SACHIN GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL)

1. Prayer

This petition has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 seeking the concession of regular bail for the petitioner in FIR No.06 dated 06.01.2026, under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 61(2), 238 of BNS, 2023 and Section 13 of the Punjab Travel Professionals Regulation Act, 2014 registered at Police Station City-1, Malerkotla, District Malerkotla, Punjab (P-1).

2. Contentions

On behalf of the petitioner

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is contended that there is no connecting or corroborative evidence linking the petitioner with the commission of the alleged offence, and that the petitioner has not committed any such offence. Accordingly, a prayer is made for grant of regular bail to the petitioner.

On behalf of the State/Complainant

On the other hand, learned State Counsel appearing on advance notice, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and has filed the custody certificate of the petitioner, which is taken on record.

Mr. Gaurav Vir Singh Behl, Advocate for the complainant has filed his vakalatnama, which is taken on record.

They oppose the prayer for gran

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top