Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sandeep Moudgil, J
Gurpreetpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. invoking jurisdiction for anticipatory bail under the statutory framework. (Para 1) |
| 2. submission of competing arguments regarding criminal allegations versus civil dispute background. (Para 2) |
| 3. evaluating whether a pending civil suit warrants the grant of bail. (Para 3) |
| 4. granting anticipatory bail conditional upon investigation cooperation. (Para 4) |
***
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL)
1. Prayer
The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Section 482 B.N.S.S. (438 of Cr.P.C.) for grant of Anticipatory bail pending trial to the Petitioners in case FIR No.50, dated 28.05.2026, U/s 333, 324, 115 (2), 351 (2), 351 (3) and 3 (5) BNS, 2023 (corresponding to section 452, 425, 323, 506 and 34 of IPC) registered at police station Ghanaur, District Patiala (Annexure P-1).
2. Contention
On behalf of the petitioner
Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. He submits that the allegations regarding criminal trespass, demolition of the boundary wall and damage to household articles are false. It is further contended that a civil dispute concerning the property in question has been pending b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
