SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 86967

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SAHIL GARG – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (ORAL)

1. Prayer

The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.0071 dated 07.03.2026 under Sections 34/420/467/468/471 of IPC (now Sections 3(5)/318(4)/338/336(2)/340(2) of BNS, 2023) registered at Police Station City Mandi Dabwali, District Dabwali (Annexure P-1).

2. Contention

On behalf of the petitioner

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is contended that the FIR has been lodged at the instance of the complainant, who allegedly harbours personal animosity towards the petitioner and, while claiming to be a news reporter, is stated to have a history of intimidating and blackmailing individuals. Counsel further submits that there is no documentary evidence on record linking the petitioner to the alleged offence. It is also submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation and to cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required.

On behalf of the State

Learned State counsel vehemently opposes the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner by stat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top