Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Kuldeep Tiwari, J
Shruti Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seeking protection for a consensual live-in relationship based on majority. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. constitutional right of majors to choose their partner under article 21. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. direction to state authorities to assess threat perception and provide legal protection. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(Oral)
1. The petitioners have knocked the doors of this Court by filing criminal writ petition under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to the official respondents to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondents no. 4 to 6 from harassing the petitioners or interfering in their peaceful 'Live-in-relationship'.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major. To substantiate his submission, he has placed reliance on Aadhar Cards of both the petitioners which are annexed respectively as Annexure P/1 and P/3 with the present writ petition. It is further averred that there is no blood relationship between them and they are living together in a 'Live-in-relationship' and they are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents concerned. T
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
