Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Harpreet Singh Brar, J
Meenakshi – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seeking protection of life and liberty under article 226. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. procedural directions regarding notice and power of attorney. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. directing police to decide representation and provide protection. (Para 6 , 7) |
***
HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL)
1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing official respondents to protect the life and liberty of petitioners at the hands of private respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, inter alia, contends that the petitioners are major and claimed to have married each other and they seek protection to their life and liberty as they apprehend danger to their lives at the hands of private respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the representation submitted by the petitioners before the jurisdictional police authorities is pending consideration and has not been decided till date.
3. Notice of motion to the official respondents only.
4. Power of Attorney on behalf of the respondent No.4 has been filed by Mr. Deepak Agnihotri, Advocate, which is ordered to be t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
