Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Harpreet Singh Brar, J
Samuel – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners sought police protection against harassment and unlawful dispossession during pending civil litigation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the state accepted the direction for time-bound disposal of the representation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. mandate for the authority to pass a speaking order on the representation within three months. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
*****
HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of appropriate directions to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to provide adequate police protection for safeguarding the petitioner’s life and personal liberty; to restrain respondent Nos. 2 and 3 from harassing the petitioner or taking any action against her at the behest of respondent Nos. 4 to 8; and to direct respondent Nos. 4 to 8 to refrain from interfering in the petitioner’s peaceful life, harassing her, or using force or any unlawful means against her, thereby causing prejudice to her.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the petitioners are the owner in possession of land situated in Village Bandianwala. He further submits that respondent No. 1 has filed a civil suit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
