SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 137927

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PRADEEP KOHLI – Appellant
Versus
GURU JAMBHESHWAR UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AND OTHERS – Respondent
CWP_31123_2026



##PAGE1##

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

119 CWP-31123-2026 Date of decision:22.09.2026 Dr. Pardeep Kohli .....Petitioner VERSUS Guru Jambheshwar University of Science & Technology and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present : Mr. Ravinder Singh Dhull, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Mansih Kumar Singla, Advocate for respondents No.1 and

2.

****

HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral)

1. This Civil Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, especially a writ in the nature of certiorari, for quashing the selection and consequential appointment of respondent No. 3 to the post of Assistant Professor (BC-B category) in the Department of Mass Communication of the respondent-University, as declared vide result/announcement dated 15.05.2026 (Annexure P-11) and appointment letter dated 15.05.2026 (Annexure P-12), on the ground that the same is in violation of the mandatory qualification of Ph.D. prescribed for appointment to the post of Assistant Professor. The petitioner also seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner, being duly qualified and the next eligible candidate, to the said post, with all consequential benefits.

##PAGE2##

2. Mr. Manish Kumar Singla, Advocate appearing on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2 has filed power of attorney, which is taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same at appropriate place.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars.

4. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.

5. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

22.09.2026 (HARPREET SINGH BRAR)

parul verma JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top