SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 3657

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
DR. MAHESH KUMAR PANWAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 10490 / 2024



[2024:RJ-JD:37186]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10490/2024 Dr. Mahesh Kumar Panwar S/o Shri Dudha Ram Panwar, Aged About 56 Years, Resident Of 1/10, Vyas Colony, Nagaur, Presently Holding The Post Of Principal Medical Officer, Govt. Jln Hospital, Nagaur (Raj.).

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, Medical And Health Services, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. Joint Secretary, Medical And Health Services (Group-2), Secretariat, Jaipur.

3. Director (Public Health), Medical And Health Services, Health Bhawan, Jaipur.

4. The Joint Director, Medical And Health Services, Zone Ajmer, Ajmer.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yashpal Khileree & Ms.Vinita For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Rajpurohit, AAG with Ms. Anita Rajpurohit HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Reportable Order

09/09/2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being heard and decided finally at this stage.

The present writ petition has been filed challenging the awaiting posting order dated 24.06.2024 (Annex.5) and relieving order dated 25.06.2024.

Briefly noted the facts of the present case are that the petitioner was appointed on the post of Medical Officer on 11.06.1996 by regular process of selection as per the provisions of the Rajasthan Medical and Health Service Rules, 1963 (for short ‘the Rules of 1963’). Thereafter, vide order dated 12/16.07.2018, he was promoted on the post of Principal Specialist (Orthopedics) as per the Rules of 1963. Pursuant to the said order, the petitioner joined as Principal Medical Officer, Nagaur on 18.08.2021. While the petitioner was working as Principal Medical Officer at Nagaur, he was kept under ‘Awaiting Posting Order’ vide order dated 24.06.2024 (Annex.5) and his Headquarter was changed from Nagaur to Directorate (Public Health), Jaipur. The petitioner was relieved from the post of Principal Medical Officer, District Hospital, Nagaur vide order dated 25.06.2024. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently and fervently submits that the awaiting posting order passed by the respondents on 24.06.2024 is in violation of the Ban imposed by the State Government vide order dated 04.01.2023. He submits that no transfer/awaiting posting order could have been passed by the respondents during the period of ban without taking permission from the office of the Hon’ble Chief Minister of Rajasthan. He submits that even the awaiting posting order is in violation of the decisions of the State Government under Rule 25- A of the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951. Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently argued that the awaiting posting order passed in the case of the petitioner is only with the purpose to adjust and accommodate one Sunita Singh at Nagaur.

To buttress his contention, learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgments of this Court rendered in case of Hemendra Kumar Trivedi vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6261/2017), decided on 13.03.2018 and in case of Satish Gupta vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4564/2020), decided on 18.08.2023. He, therefore, prays that the writ petition may be allowed and the awaiting posting order dated 24.06.2024 (Annex.5) and consequential relieving order dated 25.06.2024 (Annex.6) may be quashed and set aside.

Per contra, Mr. N.S. Rajpurohit, learned Additional Advocate General for the respondent State assisted by Ms. Anita Rajpurohit submits that it is well within the domain of the State Government to utilize the services of a government employee at a particular place in the larger public interest and, therefore, in the administrative exigency, awaiting posting order passed in the case of the petitioner is perfectly justified. Learned counsel submits that it is for the respondents-State to see that the services of a particular person ca

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top