SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 7507

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
MALIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 4224 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Rakesh Matoria, Mr. Sharwan Singh Rathore, PP

The court determined that improper weighing of cannabis plants likely resulted in a quantity below the commercial threshold, allowing bail despite serious charges under the NDPS Act.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 20, and 37 - Bail application filed by petitioner arrested for cultivating cannabis plants - Prosecution claims recovery of 240 cannabis plants exceeding commercial quantity - Court finds that actual weight of contraband may be below commercial quantity due to improper weighing - Section 37's embargo on bail not applicable as offence does not involve commercial quantity. (Paras 1-13)

(B) Bail - Grant of bail under NDPS Act - Court emphasizes that bail cannot be denied solely based on the nature of the offence if commercial quantity is not involved. (Paras 11-12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was arrested for cultivating cannabis plants on his agricultural land, with the prosecution alleging recovery of 240 plants. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated and that the recovery did not constitute a commercial quantity.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the actual weight of the cannabis plants was likely below the commercial quantity threshold, allowing for bail.

Issues: The main issues included whether the recovered quantity constituted a commercial quantity and the applicability of Section 37's bail restrictions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the improper weighing of the cannabis plants meant the actual quantity was likely below the commercial threshold, thus allowing bail despite the serious nature of the charges.

Result: Bail application allowed.

Order

07/04/2025

1. This application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.44/2024 registered at Police Station Jhallara, District Salumbar, for offences under Section 8/20(a) of the NDPS Act.

2. As per the prosecution, acting upon a secret information, a team of Police Station Jhallara raided the field belonging to the present petitioner and found 240 cannabis plants growing between the crops of wheat and corn.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel submitted that the recovery of the contraband was of cannabis plants growing on the agricultural field, thus, conscious possession of the petitioner cannot be deduced. It was also submitted that as the whole plants were weighed without removing the stems, roots, leaves etc., the said recovery amounts to an offence under section 20 (a) of NDPS act for which no commercial quantity has been prescribed. Therefore, the embargo contained under Section 37 would not be attracted.

4. Lastly, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time to conclude, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

7. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, this Court prima faice finds that the case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was cultivating cannabis plants in his fields and the quantity of the recovered plants is well above the commercial limit specified for contraband ganja.

8. The notification in effect that specifies small and commercial quantity for narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances is S.O. 1055 (E) dated 19th October, 2001 published in the Gazette of India, Extra., Pt. II Sec. 3 (ii) dated 19th October, 2001 and the commercial quantity specified therein for ganja is 20 kgs. For the purpose of determining the total weight of the recovered contraband ganja in the present case, the whole plants were taken into consideration, including the seeds, roots, stems and leaves, along with the soil as well whereas only the flowering or fruiting tops of the cannabis plants should have been taken for weighing of contraband ganja as per the defining clause under NDPS Act. As there was no bifurcation of seeds and leaves from the flowering or fruiting tops before weighing the recovered contraband. Thus, it is safe to infer that the actual weight of recovered ganja would be less than the claimed weight and therefore, below the stipulated commercial quantity.

9. The cultivation of "any cannabis plant" is prohibited and made an offence under sub-clause (b) of Section 8 of the NDPS Act. Further, it is imperative to mention Section 20 of the NDPS Act, which discusses the punishment for contravention in relation to cannabis plant and cannabis. Section 20 of the NDPS Act reads as follows:-

“20. Punishment for contravention in relation to cannabis plant and cannabis.-

Whoever, in contravention of any provisions of this Act or any rule or order made or condition of licence granted thereunder,-

(a)cultivates any cannabis plant; or

(b)produces, manufactures, possesses, sells, purchases, transports, imports inter-State, exports inter-State or uses cannabis, shall be punishable-

(i)where such contravention relates to clause (a) with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years and shall also be liable to fine which may extend to one lakh rupees

(ii)where such contravention relates to sub-clause (b),—

(A) and involves small quantity, with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, which may extend to ten thousand rupees, or with both;

(B) and i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top