SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 30548

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
SWAILAL SAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Mahaveer Singh, Mr. Abhishek Purohit, PP

Order

06/02/2024

These anticipatory bail applications have been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR No.61/2019 and FIR No.07/2019 registered at Police Station Sangad, District Jaisalmer for the offences under Sections 467, 468, 471 and 420 IPC.

Drawing attention of the Court towards various documents attached with the bail applications, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in a departmental enquiry, allegation of deflection has not been found proved. Learned counsel further submitted that in compliance of the order passed by this Court, the petitioners have already joined the investigation. It was contended that since the petitioners have already joined the investigation, no fruitful purpose would be served by sending them behind the bars. It was, therefore, prayed that the petitioners may be released on anticipatory bail.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top