SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 27374

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI, J
KALJI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Raghuveer Singh, Mr. Vikram Sharma, PP

                                                                                                                                         Order

04/01/2024

1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked by way of filing an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. at the instance of accused-petitioners. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:

S.No.Particulars of the Case
1.FIR Number215/2023
2.Concerned Police StationKalinjara
3.DistrictBanswara
4.Offences alleged in the FIRSection 8/20 of the NDPS Act
5.Offences added, if any
6.Date of passing of impugned order14.12.2023

2. It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioners that no case for the alleged offences is made out against them and their incarceration are not warranted. There are no factors at play in the case at hand that may work against grant of bail to the accused-petitioners and they have been made an accused based on conjectures and surmises.

3. Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that the present case is not fit for enlargement of accused on bail.

4. Heard and perused the material available on record. Secti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top