SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 31100

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
GANESH RAM MEENA, J
GIRDHARIRAM S/O BIRBAL RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Deepak Chauhan with Mr. Ashok Choudhary for accused petitioners in Bail Application Nos. 5409/2024, 6387/2024 & 7819/2024; Mr. S.S. Hora with Mr. Vedant Sharma for accused petitioners in Bail application Nos. 6717/2024 & 11837/2024 and 13393/2024; Mr. Madhav Mitra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Veerendra Singh, Ms. Jaya Mitra, Mr. Rakesh Choudhary and Mr. Manav Sharma for accused petitioners in Bail Application Nos. 6728/2024 & 11330/2024; Mr. Gajveer Singh Rajawat for accused petitioners in Bail Application Nos. 7340/2024 and 7351/2024; Mr. Kinshuk Jain for accused petitioner in Bail Application No. 7364/2024; Dr. Mahesh Sharma for accused petitioners in Bail Application Nos. 8281/2024 and 12558/2024; Mr. Rajvir Singh Gurjar for accused petitioner in Bail Application No. 8748/2024; Mr. Ashish Chauhan for accused petitioner in bail application No. 8749/2024; Mr. Ram Manohar Sharma with Mr. Ramanuj Sharma with Rahul Kashyap and Mr. Mazish Rashid for accused petitioner in bail application No. 8750/2024; Mr. V.R. Bajwa, Senior Advocate with Ms. Savita Nathawat and Mr. Vedant Sharma for accused petitioners in Bail Application No. 9183/2024; Mr. Ishan Kasliwal for accused petitioner No. 9710/2024; Ms. Kanika Burman with Mr. Nirbhay Tiwari and Mr. Abhishek Choudhary for accused petitioner in bail application No. 11531/2024; Mr. Anurag Sharma, Special PP with Ms. Shreya Hatila for Respondent(s)

Order

Date of Reserve ::: November 08, 2024 Date of Pronouncement ::: November 22, 2024

1. All these post arrest bail applications have been filed by the accused petitioners in connection with FIR No.0010/2024 dated 03.03.2024 registered at Police Station Special Police Station (SOG), District ATS & SOG, for the offences punishable under sections 419, 420 and 120B IPC , sections 4,5 and 6 of the Rajasthan Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 1992 (for short ‘the Act of 1992’) and section 66D of the Information & Technology Act, 2008 (for short ‘the Act of 2008’), hence, same are being decided by this common order.

2. The brief facts of the case are that complainant Niyaj Mohammad Khand, Dy. Superintendent of Police, ATS & SOG lodged an FIR No.0010/2024 dated 03.03.2024 at Police Station Special Police Station (SOG), District ATS & SOG, for the offences punishable under sections 419, 420 and 120B IPC , sections 4,5 and 6 of the Act of 1992 and section 66D of the Act of 2008, which is quoted as under:-

Accused-Girdhariram (Bail Appl. No.5409/2024) :-

3. Mr. Deepak Chauan, counsel appearing for the accused petitioner submitted that as per the charge-sheet filed against th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top