SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 369

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
VAKTARAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Ravi Panwar, Mr. Hathi Singh Jodha, PP

Table of Content
1. arrested for cultivating ganja (Para 1)
2. falsely implicated in the case (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. quantity of recovered plants (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)

                                                                                                                                                                   Order

1. These applications for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. have been filed by the petitioners who have been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.163/2024 registered at Police Station Pindwara, District Sirohi, for the offence punishable under Section 8/20 of the NDPS Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the recovery of the contraband was from ganja plants growing on the agricultural field, thus, conscious possession of the petitioners cannot be deduced. It was also submitted that as the whole plants were weighed without removing the stems, roots, leaves etc., the total weight of the 350 recovered plants of ganja recovered from the field cultivated by the petitioner- Vaktaram, i.e. 22.4 kilograms, can be safely assumed to be below the commercial quantity. Therefore, the embargo contained under Section 37 would not be attracted.

5. Pe








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top