SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 14945

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
MANOJ KUMAR GARG
GAJUNATH @ SURESHNATH KALBELIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB/11/2023



In cases involving offenses under the POCSO Act, the court may consider granting bail to the accused if there is a compromise between the victim and the accused and the trial is likely to take a long time to conclude.

Headnote:

BAIL - POCSO ACT - COMPROMISE - [Section 439 CrPC, Section 363 IPC, Section 344 IPC, Section 376(2)(n) IPC, Section 376AB IPC, Section 5(J)(ii)/6 POCSO Act, Section 5(L)(M)/6 POCSO Act]

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was arrested for allegedly kidnapping, sexually assaulting, and committing other offenses against a minor girl. The victim and the petitioner had lived together for about a year, and the victim's mother filed a false FIR against the petitioner after they separated.

Finding of the Court:

The court noted that the victim and the petitioner had compromised and that the trial would take a long time to conclude. The court also considered the fact that the petitioner had been in judicial custody for some time.

Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted bail considering the compromise between the victim and the petitioner and the delay in the trial.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that it was just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner under Section 439 CrPC, considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, including the compromise between the victim and the petitioner and the delay in the trial.

Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and directed the petitioner to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.

(1 of 2)

[CRLMB-11/2023]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11/2023

Gajunath @ Sureshnath Kalbeliya S/o Kesarnath Kalbeliya, Aged

About 24 Years, R/o Mansingh Ji Ka Jhopara, P.s. Kotdi Dist.

Bhilwara. (At Present Lodged In Dist. Jail, Bhilwara).

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

2.

Smt. Kanku Devi W/o Parasmal Kalbeliya, R/o Para P.s.

Badnor Dist. Bhilwara.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. RS Chundawat

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Vikram Sharma, PP

Mr. Deepak Choudhary

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

Order

04/01/2023

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with F.I.R.

No.216/2022 of Police Station Aasind, District Bhilwara for the

offence punishable under Sections 363, 344, 376(2)(n), 376AB

IPC and Sections 5(J)(ii)/6, 5(L)(M)/6 of POCSO Act. He has

preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the victim resided

with the petitioner for about one year and now a false FIR has

been lodged. Counsel further submits that compromise has also

been arrived at between the parties. The accused-petitioner is in

judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long

time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be

granted to the accused-petitioner.

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-11/2023]

Learned counsel for the complainant concurs the fact of

compromise, however, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the

bail application.

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances

of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused

petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is

allowed and it is directed that petitioner Gajunath @ Sureshnath

Kalbeliya S/o Kesarnath Kalbeliya, shall be released on bail in

connection with FIR No.216/2022 of Police Station Aasind, District

Bhilwara provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of

Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/-

each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance

before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever

called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

178-MS/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top