HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
MANOJ KUMAR GARG
GAJUNATH @ SURESHNATH KALBELIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB/11/2023
BAIL - POCSO ACT - COMPROMISE - [Section 439 CrPC, Section 363 IPC, Section 344 IPC, Section 376(2)(n) IPC, Section 376AB IPC, Section 5(J)(ii)/6 POCSO Act, Section 5(L)(M)/6 POCSO Act]
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was arrested for allegedly kidnapping, sexually assaulting, and committing other offenses against a minor girl. The victim and the petitioner had lived together for about a year, and the victim's mother filed a false FIR against the petitioner after they separated.
Finding of the Court:
The court noted that the victim and the petitioner had compromised and that the trial would take a long time to conclude. The court also considered the fact that the petitioner had been in judicial custody for some time.
Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted bail considering the compromise between the victim and the petitioner and the delay in the trial.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that it was just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner under Section 439 CrPC, considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, including the compromise between the victim and the petitioner and the delay in the trial.
Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and directed the petitioner to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.
(1 of 2)
[CRLMB-11/2023]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11/2023
Gajunath @ Sureshnath Kalbeliya S/o Kesarnath Kalbeliya, Aged
About 24 Years, R/o Mansingh Ji Ka Jhopara, P.s. Kotdi Dist.
Bhilwara. (At Present Lodged In Dist. Jail, Bhilwara).
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2.
Smt. Kanku Devi W/o Parasmal Kalbeliya, R/o Para P.s.
Badnor Dist. Bhilwara.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. RS Chundawat
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vikram Sharma, PP
Mr. Deepak Choudhary
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
04/01/2023
The petitioner has been arrested in connection with F.I.R.
No.216/2022 of Police Station Aasind, District Bhilwara for the
offence punishable under Sections 363, 344, 376(2)(n), 376AB
IPC and Sections 5(J)(ii)/6, 5(L)(M)/6 of POCSO Act. He has
preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the victim resided
with the petitioner for about one year and now a false FIR has
been lodged. Counsel further submits that compromise has also
been arrived at between the parties. The accused-petitioner is in
judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long
time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be
granted to the accused-petitioner.
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-11/2023]
Learned counsel for the complainant concurs the fact of
compromise, however, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the
bail application.
Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances
of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the
case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused
petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is
allowed and it is directed that petitioner Gajunath @ Sureshnath
Kalbeliya S/o Kesarnath Kalbeliya, shall be released on bail in
connection with FIR No.216/2022 of Police Station Aasind, District
Bhilwara provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of
Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/-
each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance
before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever
called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
178-MS/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.