SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 14966

[2023:RJ-JD:19903]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 594/2023 Bherulal S/o Sh. Mangu Ji Jat, Aged About 54 Years, Nehru Nagar, Reeth Road, Kotadi. Presently R/o Magistrate Colony, Tilak Nagar, Dist. Bhilwara.

----Petitioner Versus Jamna W/o Sh. Bherulal And D/o Sh. Gambhir Jat, Kotdi, Presently R/o Jaat Mohalla, Pur, Dist. Bhilwara.

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.R. Kumawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.S. Rathore HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

ORDER RESERVED ON ::: 05/07/2023 ORDER PRONOUNCED ON ::: 10/07/2023 BY THE COURT:-

1. By way of filing the instant Criminal Revision Petition challenge has been made to the order dated 12.05.2023 passed by the learned Family Court No.1, Bhilwara in Misc. Criminal Case No.333/2018 whereby the application filed by the respondent-wife under Section 127 of the Cr.P.C. was allowed and the amount of maintenance was enhanced to the tune of Rs.4,000/- per month.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that marriage of the respondent was solemnized with the petitioner 24 years ago. Due to some discord, the parties separated themselves since the year

1999.

3. An application under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. came to be filed on behalf of the respondent-wife seeking maintenance for herself which came to be allowed vide order dated 05.10.1999 by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Bhilwara whereby the petitioner was directed to pay Rs.400/- per month to the respondent-wife. There is no dispute in this regard that parties were living separately and the amount of maintenance was being paid to her regularly. It appears that in the year 2017, a petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act was submitted before the learned Family Court, Bhilwara averring therein that their marriage was solemnized 24 years ago and due to temperamental differences and discord of common petulance, they were living separately. Every effort of reconciliation/re-union went into vain. It is specifically mentioned in the petition and the affidavit supported thereto that with the consent of the parties, the petitioner-husband had paid a sum of Rs.6,50,000/- towards lifetime amount of maintenance to the respondent-wife as agreed between them. Two bankers’ cheque of the said amount had been received by the wife during the proceeding. The learned Family Judge vide its judgment dated 10.07.2017 had allowed the petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marraige Act and passed a decree of dissolution of marriage solemnized between them while specifically averring that the lifetime amount of maintenance had been received by the respondent-wife.

4. Subsequent thereto, the respondent-wife again moved an application under Section 127 of the Cr.P.C. on 13.07.2018 for enhancement of the amount awarded under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. which has been allowed by the learned Family Judge vide order dated 12.05.2023 and the amount of maintenance has been enhanced from Rs.400/- to Rs.4,000/- per month which is to be paid by the petitioner-husband to the respondent-wife. The said order is under assail.

5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the material available on record. More particularly, the petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, affidavit annexed to the petition and the judgment and decree dated 10.07.2017.

6. Indisputably, the wedded life of the parties could not be subsisted and it seems that after some time of their marriage, a rift entered in their matrimonial life and the respondent-wife had left the company of petitioner-husband and used to reside separately.

7. The order of maintenance passed by the learned trial Court under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. was never made to challenge by the petitioner-husband. It appears that due to intervention of members of the Society, the parties decided to resolve their dispute permanently and thus, an amount of permanent alimony was settled and as per the agreed terms, a sum of Rs.6,50,000/- was paid by the petitioner-husband to the respondent-wife as full and final settlement and lifetime maintenance in one go. The parties stated before the trial Court that they have arrived at the settlement voluntarily and with full knowledge and without any coercion or duress. Clear averments in this regard were made in the petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act and the affidavit annexed thereto. The learned Judge, Family Court too considered and observe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top