HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
MANOJ KUMAR GARG
BANWARI KUMAWAT S/O SHIVRAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB/17586/2022
BAIL - POCSO ACT - SECTION 376(2)(N) - NO ALLEGATION OF RAPE AGAINST THE ACCUSED - BAIL GRANTED
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was arrested for offenses under Sections 342, 506, 109, and 376(2)(n) of the IPC and Sections 3/4 and 5(L)/6 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The prosecutrix did not allege rape against the petitioner, and the challan had been presented.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there was no allegation of rape against the petitioner and that the trial would take a long time to conclude.
Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted bail considering the absence of rape allegations and the delay in trial.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the absence of rape allegations and the delay in trial justified granting bail to the petitioner.
Final Decision: The petitioner was granted bail on a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17586/2022
Banwari Kumawat S/o Shivraj, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Sethan,
Tehsil Pisangan, P.s. Pisangan, Ajmer. (Presently Confined At
Central Jail Ajmer)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Vidyut Kumar Gupta
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Imran Khan, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
10/01/2023
The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR
No.217/2022 of Police Station Pisangan, District Ajmer, for the
offences punishable under Section 342, 506, 109 and 376(2)(n) of
IPC and Sections 3/4 and 5(L)/6 of POCSO Act, 2012. He has
preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that according to
the statement of prosecutrix, no allegation for committing rape
has been levelled against the present petitioner. Challan of the
case has already been presented. The accused petitioner is in
judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long
time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be
granted to the accused-petitioner.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-17586/2022]
Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances
of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the
case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused
petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is
allowed and it is directed that petitioner Banwari Kumawat S/o
Shivraj, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR
No.217/2022 of Police Station Pisangan, District Ajmer provided
he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two
sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction
of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each
and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till
the completion of the trial.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
Ishan-33/
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.