SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 18877

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
LAXMAN SINGH MEENA SON OF SHRI HAR VILAS MEENA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Order

19/03/2025

1. A limited prayer has been made by the counsel for the petitioner for issuing directions to the disciplinary authority to complete the departmental proceedings of charge-sheet dated 16.11.2022 within a time frame.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge-sheet under Rule 16 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 (for short ‘the Rules of 1958’) was served upon the petitioner on

16.11.2022, but in-spite of passing of considerable time, till date, the same has not been decided and now, the petitioner is approaching toward the age of his retirement i.e. on 31.07.2025. Counsel submits that in case, charge- sheet remains pending at the time of retirement of the petitioner, he would not be in position to get retiral dues, therefore, appropriate directions be issued to the authorities concerned to conclude departmental proceedings, expeditiously.

3. In the case of Prem Nath Bali Vs. Registrar, High Court of Delhi and Ors., reported in AIR 2016 SC 101 the Hon’ble Apex Court has emphasized that it is the duty of the employer to ensure that the departmental inquiry initiated against the delinquent employee is conclu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top