SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 32466

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, MUNNURI LAXMAN
RAJARAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Order

18/12/2024

1. During the course of hearing, the main issue which arises for consideration is whether the disputed land is part of the forest land or revenue land/abadi land under the jurisdiction of the revenue authorities.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the Revenue Department, referring to averments made in paragraph No.3 of his reply, would submit that Khasra No.30 consisting of total 1454 Bighas and 7 Biswa of land; Khasra No.30/1 consisting of 205.8240 hectares of land is recorded in the name of Forest Department and the same has been mutated in the revenue records as Oran Rifay Aam Bhumi under the Entry No.2 vide order No.142 dated 28.03.1980 passed by Sub-Divisional Officer, South Municipal, Bikaner; Khasra No.30/2 consisting of total 7.550 hectares and Khasra No.30/3 consisting of 1.0419 hectares are being registered as Gair Mumkin Abadi land in the revenue records which was also registered on 28.03.1980 under an order passed by Sub-Divisional Officer, South Municipal, Bikaner. That land was earlier recorded as part of Oran Refay Aam Bhumi which was earlier registered as Oran Bhumi in Khasra No.30(old).

3. Learned counsel for the Forest Department, on the other hand, re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top