SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 29451

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL, J
NAVEEN KUMAR RAMPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Judgment / Order

24/01/2024

This criminal revision petition is directed against the order dated 10.08.2004 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.4, Ajmer (for brevity “the learned trial Court”) in Criminal Case No.275/2004 whereby, while allowing an application filed under Section 319 CrPC by the prosecution, cognizance against the petitioner has been taken under Sections 409, 467, 468 & 471 read with Section 120-B IPC and has been summoned through arrest warrant.

The relevant facts in brief are that the complainant Smt.Manna Devi submitted a written complaint in the learned trial Court stating therein that she, alongwith her two sons namely Laxman Chand and Mahendra Kumar had gone to State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as “the Bank”) on 12.10.2002 for opening of the bank accounts in her sons’ name and handed over a sum of ₹40,000/- to the petitioner to deposit a sum of ₹20,000/- each in the bank accounts in her sons’ name. It was further stated that after completion of paper formalities, the original passbooks were handed over by the co-accused Bhanwar Lal at her home. It was alleged that when she went to withdraw the amount, it transpired that the passbook

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top