SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 3031

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
FARJAND ALI
DEEPAK KUMAR MEENA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Order

17/02/2025

1. By way of filing the instant miscellaneous petition, a challenge is made to the very lodging of the report dated 08.12.2024 in the form of a First Information Report (FIR)

before the Department of Forest.

2. Heard learned counsels present for the parties and gone through the materials available on record.

3. The second part of the First Schedule appended to the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), classifies offences based on their bailability and whether they are cognizable or non-cognizable. Notably, the Indian Forest Act, 1927, does not expressly designate whether the offences punishable under its provisions are bailable, non-bailable, cognizable, or non-cognizable. In the absence of explicit classification under the special statute, the general principles of the Cr.P.C. will govern the determination of these aspects. Sections 41 and 42 of the Indian Forest Act prescribe a maximum punishment of six months' imprisonment. As per Part II of the First Schedule to the Cr.P.C., an offence punishable with imprisonment for less than three years is deemed to be non- cognizable and bailable unless specifically stated otherwise in the enactment. Therefore, by operati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top