HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
MANOJ KUMAR GARG
HARI NAYAK S/O SHRI BHAWARLAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB/14392/2022
BAIL - POCSO ACT - CONSENT - SECTION 439 CRPC - SUMMARY
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was arrested for offenses under Sections 363, 366 of IPC, and 3/4 of the POCSO Act, 2012, and alternative Section 376 of IPC. The prosecutrix, in her statement, mentioned that she roamed with the petitioner and resided with him for ten days without raising any hue and cry, and if anything happened, it was with her consent.
Finding of the Court:
The court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, granted bail to the petitioner under Section 439 CrPC, considering the totality of the facts and circumstances.
Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted bail considering the prosecutrix's statement and the potential delay in the trial.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner was entitled to bail as the prosecutrix's statement indicated consent, and the trial was likely to take a long time to conclude.
Final Decision: The petitioner was granted bail on the condition that he executes a personal bond and provides two sureties.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14392/2022
Hari Nayak S/o Shri Bhawarlal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o
Khandel Jaisinghpura, Police Station Phulera, District Jaipur, At
Present Kishan Choudhary Bricks Industry Kachnar, Police
Station Narena, District Jaipur ( At Present Accused Confined In
Central Jail Jaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Rajesh Gadwal
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna, Dy.G.A.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
11/01/2023
The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.
193/2021 of Police Station Narena, District Jaipur, for the offence
punishable under Sections 363 and 366 of IPC and Section 3/4 of
POCSO Act, 2012 and alternative Section 376 of IPC. He has
preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
prosecutrix has been examined in the Court as PW/1 and
according to her statement, she mentioned that she roamed with
the petitioner and resided alongwith him for a period of ten days
and during this period she has not raised any hue and cry and if
anything happened, then it was with the consent of the
prosecutrix. The accused-petitioner is behind the bars and the trial
of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded.
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-14392/2022]
Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-
petitioner.
Learned Deputy Government Advocate vehemently opposed
the bail application.
Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances
of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the
case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused
petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is
allowed and it is directed that petitioner Hari Nayak S/o Shri
Bhawarlal, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR
No.193/2021 of Police Station Narena, District Jaipur, provided he
executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two
sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction
of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each
and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till
the completion of the trial.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
Ishan/11
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.