2023 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 8290
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
RAVINDRA @ DINESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMP/1933/2022
Police authorities have a duty to consider requests for protection from threats to life and liberty on their merits and in accordance with the law.
Headnote:
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, Ravindra, and his family members faced a genuine threat to their life and liberty due to matrimonial issues.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the respondent police station to consider the petitioner's representation for police protection strictly in accordance with the law.
Issues: The petitioner sought police protection due to a threat to his life and liberty arising from matrimonial issues.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the police station should consider the petitioner's representation on its merits and in accordance with the law.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the respondent police station, which was directed to consider it strictly in accordance with the law.
(1 of 2)
[CRLMP-1933/2022]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1933/2022
Ravindra @ Dinesh S/o Shri Lal Chand Acharya, Aged About 32
Years, B/c Acharya R/o 243/144 Laxman Nagar C Ramzanji Ka
Hattha Road Nandari Jodhpur Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2.
The S.h.o., Ps Banar Police Commissionerate (East)
Jodhpur Raj.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Chatur Bhuj for Mr. Avin
Chhangani.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. MS Bhati, PP.
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
02/01/2023
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner and his family members are facing the genuine threat of
life and liberty. Learned counsel further submits that due to the
matrimonial issues, the petitioner requires police protection.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a limited
submission that the petitioner may be given liberty to file a
representation before the respondent no.2 with a direction that
the same may be considered, strictly in accordance with law.
3.
In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of
with liberty to the petitioner to move a representation to the
respondent no.2, who shall take the representation and consider it
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-1933/2022]
on merits, strictly in accordance with law. The report furnished by
learned Public Prosecutor is taken on record.
4.
All pending applications also stand disposed of.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
42-/Jitender//-