HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN, J
SMT. GAYATRI DEVI W/O LATE SHRI RAMODACHARYA – Appellant
Versus
JAIPUR SHAHAR HINDU VIKAS SAMITI – Respondent
In the context of a public trust, a minor trustee is recognized as a person who holds a position of trust on behalf of a minor, such as an idol or deity that is considered a perpetual minor. The law and the court's reasoning establish that properties endowed to a deity or idol are vested in the idol itself, which is regarded as a juristic person or a legal entity in Hindu law. The trustee, such as a Mahant or Shebait, acts as a manager or caretaker of the trust property and the idol, but does not have ownership rights over the properties. The properties are deemed to belong to the idol, which is a minor and cannot manage its own affairs or execute legal actions on its own behalf.
Since the idol is a perpetual minor, the law mandates that the guardian or the State shall oversee the management and administration of the trust properties vested in the idol. The trustee’s role is limited to performing religious duties, such as seva pooja, and managing the properties only for the benefit of the idol. The trustee cannot alienate or transfer the properties vested in the idol for personal gain, as these properties are considered to be in the ownership of the deity itself, not the trustee (!) (!) .
Furthermore, the law confers a special status upon the idol as a juristic person, which means it possesses a legal personality for the purpose of owning property and safeguarding its interests. The properties are to be managed in accordance with the original endowment and the religious purpose for which they were dedicated. The trustee or Mahant acts as a de facto or de jure manager, but the ownership remains with the idol, which is a minor and under the guardianship of the State (!) (!) (!) .
In summary, a minor trustee of a public trust, especially when the trust property is vested in an idol or deity, is a managerial or custodial figure who holds a fiduciary position. The properties belong to the idol, which is a minor, and the trustee’s authority is limited to managing and protecting these properties for the religious and spiritual purpose of the trust. The trustee cannot claim ownership or alienate the properties in their own name, as the properties are considered to be in the ownership of the idol, a perpetual minor, with the State acting as its guardian (!) .
Reportable Reserved on: 22/02/2024 Pronounced on: 22/07/2024 Sr. No. Contents Page Nos.
Part A Prefatory Remarks 8 Part B Introduction: Origin, Significance and Historical Background of the Galta Peeth Dispute 8-24 Part C Orders Impugned Dt. 28.03.2013 and 10.11.2016 24-25 Part D Submissions of the Petitioners 26-32 Part E Submissions of the Respondents 32-40 Part F Issues/Points of Determination 40-41 Part G Discussions and Findings 41-96 Part H Ancillary Remarks 96-100 Part I Conclusion Part J Directions 101-104 (Downloaded on 24/07/2024 at 12:00:40 AM) (8 of 104) Part A Prefatory Remarks
1.Since time immemorial, the history and culture of this country have been home to the quests for truth, whether it be through the material, the political or the spiritual. By virtue of the present set of petitions, this Court is called upon to exercise its adjudicatory authority, with regards to the issues emanating from the administration of Thikana Galta Ji and the ownership of its properties, which vide orders impugned dated 28.03.2013 and 10.11.2016, passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Devasthan and Commissioner, Devasthan Department (Appellate Authority) respectively, are stated to ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.