HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
FARJAND ALI
Sukhdev Chayal S/o Shri Fusaram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp – Respondent
Order
25/02/2025
1. The instant misc. petitions have been preferred by the petitioners under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter to be referred as “BNSS”) for quashing of the FIR No. 30/2025 at Police Station Bichiwal, District Bikaner for the offence under Sections 318(4)(Corresponding of Section 420 of IPC), 338 (Corresponding of Section 467 of IPC), 336(3) (Corresponding of Section 468 of IPC), 340(2)(Corresponding of Section 471 of IPC), 316(2)(Corresponding of Section 406 of IPC) and 61(2)(a) (Corresponding of Section 120B of IPC) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (hereinafter to be referred as “BNS”).
2. Briefly stating the facts of the case are that the complainant, claiming to be an authorized representative of Sahara Prime City Ltd., alleged that Bhawani Shankar (accused and petitioner in S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 1310/2025), Malaram, and Pyarelal, who owned agricultural land in Khasra Nos. 38/19/5, 38/19/2, and 63/19 (totaling 87 bighas), had entered into a “Developer’s Agreement” with the company in 2008, transferring ownership rights and registering the agreement with the Sub-Registrar, Bikaner. However, despite this agreement, the landow
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.