Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
FARJAND ALI
SOHEL ALIAS JAPATI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
Order
02/08/2024
1. Despite service, no one has appeared on behalf of the respondent No.2 - victim/complainant.
2. Proof of service be taken on record.
3. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked by way of filing an appeal under Section 14A(2) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act at the instance of accused-appellant. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:
| S. No. | Particulars of the Case | |
| 1. | FIR Number | 31/2024. |
| 2. | Concerned Police Station | Sadar Kotwali. |
| 3. | District | Jodhpur City East. |
| 4. | Offences alleged in the FIR U/Sec. 307, 324, 34 of IPC. | |
| 5. | Offences added, if any | U/Sec. 326 of IPC, Sec. 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act and Sect. 4/25 of Arms Act. |
| 6. | Date of passing of impugned order | 08.07.2024 |
4. It is contended on behalf of the accused-appellant that no case for the alleged offences is made out against him and his incarceration is not warranted. There are no factors at play in the case at hand that may work against grant of bail to the accused- appellant and he has been made an accused based on conjectures and surmises.
5. Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that similarly situated
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
