HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
MANOJ KUMAR GARG
NARAYAN @ MANGI LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB/15031/2022
BAIL - POCSO ACT - CONSENSUAL RELATIONSHIP - COMPROMISE - [Section 439 CrPC, Section 3(1)/4 POCSO Act]
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was arrested for offenses under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n) of IPC and Section 3(1)/4 of the POCSO Act. The prosecutrix and the petitioner were in a consensual relationship, and she had voluntarily accompanied him to various places. A compromise had been reached between the parties.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner and the prosecutrix were in a consensual relationship and that the prosecutrix had voluntarily accompanied the petitioner. The court also noted that a compromise had been reached between the parties.
Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted bail considering the consensual nature of the relationship, the compromise between the parties, and the stage of the trial.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner was entitled to bail considering the totality of the circumstances, including the consensual nature of the relationship, the compromise between the parties, and the stage of the trial.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petitioner's bail application and directed his release on bail.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15031/2022
Narayan @ Mangi Lal S/o Shri Ratanlal Kalbeliya, Aged About 27
Years, R/o Jalki Ka Kheda, Ps Gangrar, Dist. Chittorgarh. (At
Present Lodged At Dist. Jail Chittorgarh).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. S.S. Sisodiya
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. S.K. Mehar, PP
Mr. Dinesh Chandra Mali, for
complainant.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
04/01/2023
The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.
151/2022 of Police Station Gangrar, District Chittorgarh, for the
offence punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n) of IPC and
Section 3(l)/4 of POCSO Act. He has preferred this bail application
under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the
statement of prosecutrix recorded under Sections 161 and 164
Cr.P.C, there was love affair between her and the present
petitioner and she went along with the accused-petitioner to many
places on her own free will and during this period she did not raise
any hue and cry. He further submits that now a compromise has
also arrived at between the parties. Challan of the case has
already been presented. The accused-petitioner is behind the bars
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-15031/2022]
and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be
concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the
accused-petitioner.
Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail
application.
Counsel for the complainant concurs the fact of compromise.
Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances
of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the
case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused
petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is
allowed and it is directed that petitioner Narayan @ Mangi Lal S/o
Shri Ratanlal Kalbeliya, shall be released on bail in connection
with FIR No.151/2022 of Police Station Gangrar, District
Chittorgarh, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of
Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/-
each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance
before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever
called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
109-Ishan/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.