2023 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 10393
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT PRINCIPAL SEAT JODHPUR
BRIJ LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLR 766 2023
[2023:RJ-JD:22277]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 766/2023
Brij Lal S/o Kashi Ram, Aged About 57 Years, Chak 4 Rjm,
Gopalsar P.s. Rajiyasar Dist. Sri Ganganagar. (At Present Lodged
In Sub Jail, Nohar).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Vikas, on behalf of Mr. Rakesh
Moatoria
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
18/07/2023
1.
The petitioner was convicted and sentenced by the learned
Judicial Magistrate, Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh vide
judgment dated 18.09.2019 passed in Regular Criminal Case
No.186/2011 in the following terms :-
Offence for which convicted
Sentence, fine and default
sentence
Section 16/54 of the Rajasthan
Excise Act
3 years S.I., fine of Rs.20,000/-,
default sentence 1 month S.I.
Section 279 IPC
1 month S.I., fine of Rs.500/-,
default sentence 7 days S.I.
Section 336 IPC
1 month S.I., fine of Rs.500/-,
default sentence 7 days S.I.
Section 353 IPC
1 month S.I., fine of Rs.500/-,
default sentence 7 days S.I.
Section 3 of the PDPP Act
1 year S.I., fine of Rs.500/-, default
sentence 7 days S.I.
An appeal was filed by the petitioner challenging the aforesaid
judgment, which came to be partly allowed by the learned
Additional Sessions Judge No.1, Nohar, District Hanumangarh
[2023:RJ-JD:22277]
(2 of 6)
[CRLR-766/2023]
(Camp Rawatsar) vide judgment dated 03.07.2023 passed in
Criminal Appeal No.100/2019, whereby while maintaining the
conviction and sentence for the other offences, conviction of the
petitioner for the offence under Section 353 of the IPC was set
aside and he was acquitted from the said offence. Being
aggrieved by the aforesaid judgments, the petitioner has preferred
the instant revision petition under Section 397 read with Section
401 of the CrPC.
2.
Bereft of unnecessary details, the facts relevant and
essential for disposal of the instant revision petition are that on
17.01.2009 at 12.00 p.m. Mr. Rajneesh Pooniya, RPS, CO,
Rawatsar submitted a report at the Police Station Rawatsar to the
effect that on that on 17.01.2009 he alongwith other police
personnel conducted a Nakabandi at Chohilawali Tiraha in
Jakhdawali Rohi. At 06.00 p.m., they noticed a white unnumbered
Bolero vehicle coming from towards Suratgarh, in which four
persons including the driver were sitting. On signaling to stop the
vehicle, the driver broke Nakabandi and drove on Chohilawali Link
Road. The police team followed them in Government Gypsy, on
which the driver of the Bolero sped up the vehicle and continued
driving in rashless manner causing danger to the lives of public at
large. The pursuit continued for a while, during which, when the
police party tried to stop the Bolero vehicle by putting Gypsy
infront of it, the driver of the Bolero hit it, but did not stop. Finally
at 07.30 p.m. the Bolero was stuck in a sand dune in the field of
[2023:RJ-JD:22277]
(3 of 6)
[CRLR-766/2023]
Gurbachan Singh at Rohi Rawatsar. The four persons sitting in the
vehicle tried to escape from the spot. The driver and one other
persons were caught, while the other two made their escape good.
The persons, who were caught, told their names as Vijay Singh
and Brijlal and that the persons who ran away were Sandeep Jat
and Kanwar Singh Jat. They stated that they tried to flee because
the vehicle was loaded with illicit spirit meant to be used for
manufaturing country liquor. When the accused failed to furnish
any explanation or licence, the aforesaid spirit was seized and the
accused were arrested. On the basis of the aforesaid report FIR
No.17/2009 came to be registered at the Police Station and the
investigation commenced. After usual investigation, charge-sheet
was submitted against the accused persons for the offence under
Sec