SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 15672

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
SHYORAM @ SIYARAM S/O CHHOTURAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB/18096/2022



An accused may be granted bail under Section 439 CrPC if the court finds it just and proper to do so, considering factors such as the length of custody, the release of co-accused on bail, and the nature of the allegations.

Headnote:

BAIL - SECTION 439 CRPC - OFFENCES UNDER SECTIONS 365 & 384 IPC - SUBSEQUENTLY OFFENCES UNDER SECTIONS 364A, 365, 384, 395, 120-B & 342 IPC - BAIL GRANTED CONSIDERING LENGTH OF CUSTODY, RELEASE OF CO-ACCUSED ON BAIL AND NATURE OF ALLEGATIONS

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was arrested in connection with an FIR for offences under Sections 365 & 384 IPC, and later for offences under Sections 364A, 365, 384, 395, 120-B & 342 IPC. He filed a bail application under Section 439 CrPC.

Finding of the Court:

The court noted that the petitioner had been in custody since 14.11.2022, that the investigation against him was complete, and that co-accused persons had been granted bail. Considering these factors, the court found it just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner.

Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted bail under Section 439 CrPC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner was entitled to bail considering the length of his custody, the release of co-accused on bail, and the nature of the allegations against him.

Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and directed that the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 18096/2022

Shyoram @ Siyaram S/o Chhoturam, Aged About 32 Years, R/o

Booj, Police Station Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur(Raj.) (At

Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)

----Petitioner/Accused

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. R.S. Bhardwaj

For Respondent(s)

For Complainant(s)

:

Mr. Mahendra Meena, P.P.

Mr. Vipin Sharma

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

Order

09/01/2023

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR

No.292/2022 registered at Police Station Jamwaramgarh District

Jaipur Rural for the offence(s) under Section(s) 365 & 384 IPC

and later on for the offences under Sections 364A, 365, 384, 395,

120-B & 342 IPC

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that he

has falsely been implicated in this case. With regard to his criminal

antecedents, learned counsel submitted that barring one case, all

the cases are of remote past, i.e., instituted prior to year 2010

and the offences are minor in nature. He further submitted that

except one case, he stands acquitted in other cases. Learned

counsel submitted that the petitioner is in custody since

14.11.2022, investigation as against him is complete, co-accused

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-18096/2022]

persons have been extended benefit of bail and prayed for his

release on bail.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned

counsel for the complainant opposed the prayer.

Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by

learned counsel for the petitioner, the nature of allegations, the

material on record, his length of custody and release of co-

accused persons on bail by the learned Sessions Court; but,

without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this

Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed

that accused-petitioner Shyoram @ Siyaram S/o Chhoturam

shall be released on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection

with afore-mentioned FIR registered at concerned Police Station,

provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/-

(Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of

Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction

of the trial court with the stipulation that he shall comply with all

the conditions laid down under Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

Manish/s-186

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top