[2023/RJJD/002001]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 155/2023

Baby Kanwar W/o Mahendra Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o

Plot No. 19-B, Khasra No. 6, 27, 28, 29 Vaibhav Vihar Yojna,

Sikargarh, Jodhpur (Raj.) Liquor Shop Kakelao Bilada.

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary

Department Of Finance (Excise) Secretariat, Jaipur.

2.

Commissioner, Excise Department, Udaipur.

3.

District Excise Officer, Jodhpur.

4.

Rajasthan State Beverages Corporation Ltd. (Rsbcl),

Through Managing Director, Vitta Bhawan, (D-Block, Ist

Floor), Janpath, Near Vidhan Sabha, Jaipur.

5.

Rajasthan State Ganga Nagar Sugar Mill Limited, Head

Office Jaipur Through Managing Director, 4Th Flor, Nehru

Shankar Bhawan, Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Arvind Kulhar.

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Sandeep Shah, Sr. Advocate &

AAG assisted by Ms Akshiti Singhvi.

Mr. Girish Sankhla.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order

24/01/2023

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely

covered by a decision of coordinate bench of this court in a batch

of writ petitions led by S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.11280/2022

(Tulsi Ram Gocher V/s State of Rajasthan & Ors.) decided on

14.10.2022.

[2023/RJJD/002001]

(2 of 2)

[CW-155/2023]

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the

present writ petition may be disposed of in the light of order dated

14.10.2022 passed by the coordinate bench.

Considering the limited prayer made, the present writ

petition is also disposed of in terms of the order dated 14.10.2022

which reads as under:

“Learned Additional Advocate General, at the outset, submits that all

the demand notices/ orders impugned and under challenge in these

writ petitions may be treated as show cause notices to the petitioners.

He submits that the petitioners may file their response/ reply/

representation against these notices/ orders within a period of four

weeks from today whereupon, the respondents shall proceed in

accordance with law. Learned AAG further submits that all

consequential proceedings including attachment orders in pursuance

of the demand notices/orders in the instant writ petitions shall stand

withdrawn.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the

aforesaid submission and prays that the instant writ petitions may be

disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

In view thereof, these writ petitions are disposed of in terms

of submission made by learned AAG”.

It is made clear that the present writ petition is being

disposed of on the statement made by learned counsel for the

petitioner on the ground that the facts in the present case are

identical to the facts of the cases which have been disposed of

vide order dated 14.10.2022. The respondents shall not be

influenced by any observation made in this order. In case, the

facts in the present cases are different, they can take appropriate

action in accordance with law.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

207-AnilSingh/-