SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 15905

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
MOHAN LAL – Appellant
Versus
SMT SARVEEN AND ORS – Respondent
CMA/3430/2017



Headnote:

Fact of the Case:

The appellant filed an appeal against the order of the Tribunal. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant and claimant No. 1 arrived at a compromise and submitted the compromise dated 14.10.2020.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the application and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. The court also directed the concerned Tribunal to refund Rs.25,000/- to the appellant which was deposited by him as a pre-requisite condition to file the appeal.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn and the concerned Tribunal was directed to refund Rs.25,000/- to the appellant.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3430/2017

Mohan Lal S/o Kanhaiya Lal Bairawa, B/c Bairawa, Sangrampura,

Teh. Sawai Madhopur

----Appellant

Versus

1.

Smt. Sarveen W/o Noushad, B/c Musalman, Jetpur, Teh.

Khandar, Distt. Sawai Madhopur

2.

Smt. Femida W/o Jabbar Khan B/c Musalman, Jetpur,

Teh. Khandar, Distt. Sawai Madhopur

3.

Mukesh S/o Heera Nath, Peelawa Nadi, Police Station

Malarana Doongar Presently Reside At Chhabari Chouck,

Alampur, Sawai Madhopur

4.

Satyanarayan S/o Nathu Lal B/c Gurjar, Alanpur, Sawai

Madhopur

----Respondents

For Appellant(s)

:

Mr. Amit Jindal, Adv. on behalf of

Mr. Ashindra Gautam, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

:

None present

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

Order

04/01/2023

Matter comes up on an application (IA No.1/2022) for

disposal of the appeal on the basis of compromise arrived at

between the parties and for issuing direction to the Tribunal to

refund Rs.25,000/- to the appellant, which was deposited by him

as a pre-requisite condition to file the appeal.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that during the

pendency of the appeal, the matter has been settled and both the

parties i.e. appellant and claimant No.1 have arrived at a

compromise. He has submitted the compromise dated 14.10.2020

(2 of 2)

[CMA-3430/2017]

as annexure A/1 alongwith the application. So, the appellant

wants to withdraw the appeal. He prays that the concerned

Tribunal be directed to refund Rs.25,000/- to the appellant which

was deposited by him as a pre-requisite condition to file the

appeal.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, same is

allowed. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The concerned

Tribunal is directed to refund Rs.25,000/- to the appellant which

was deposited by him as a pre-requisite condition to file the

appeal.

Consequent upon, the dismissal of the appeal, the stay

application also stands disposed of accordingly.

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

Seema/31

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top