SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 7512

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
DINESH MEHTA
NAKHAT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 8059 / 2025



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8059/2025

1. Nakhat Singh S/o Idan Singh, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Jalam Nagar Kheda Bagoriya Tehsil Dechu District Phalodi.

2. Lum Singh S/o Jodh Singh, Aged About 74 Years, Resident Of Jalam Nagar Kheda Bagoriya Tehsil Dechu District Phalodi.

3. Prem Singh S/o Hari Singh, Aged About 49 Years, Resident Of Jalam Nagar Kheda Bagoriya Tehsil Dechu District Phalodi.

4. Hothi Singh S/o Panne Singh, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Jalam Nagar Kheda Bagoriya Tehsil Dechu District Phalodi.

5. Jetha Ram S/o Pancha Ram, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Jalam Nagar Kheda Bagoriya Tehsil Dechu District Phalodi.

6. Pratap Singh S/o Guman Singh, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Jalam Nagar Kheda Bagoriya Tehsil Dechu District Phalodi.

7. Durjan Singh S/o Hem Singh, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Jalam Nagar Kheda Bagoriya Tehsil Dechu District Phalodi.

----Petitioners Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. District Collector, Phalodi

3. Sub Divisional Officer, Dechu, District Phalodi.

4. Tehsildar, Dechu, District Phalodi.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. S. Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. I. R. Choudhary, AAG assisted by Mr. Kuldeep Solanki Mr. Yogesh Sharma for Mr. S. S. Ladrecha, AAG JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Order

25/04/2025

1. The petitioners have approached this Court with a grievance that petitioners’ village is proposed to be included in a Gram Panchayat, which is about 12 kms away whereas, the present Gram Panachayat headquarter in which petitioners’ village is presently included namely ‘Kheda Bagoriya’, is only 3 KM away from their village.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that though a representation dated 08.04.2025 has been furnished but the respondent – authorities are not likely to consider the same in view of the immense political pressure upon them.

3. Be that as it may.

4. The writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation along with photo copy of the earlier representation dated 08.04.2025, copy of the circular dated 10.01.2025 and certified copy of the order instant within a period of three days from today.

5. In case, a representation is so addressed, the competent authority – District Collector shall consider the same in accordance with law in light of the Circular dated 10.01.2025 issued by the State Government.

6. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioners’ grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.

7. In case any order prejudicial to petitioners’ right is passed, their legal right to challenge the same shall stand reserved.

8. Stay application also stands disposed of.

(DINESH MEHTA),J

542-Arun/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top