Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, J
Arjun Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners' engagement lacks contractual privity. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. liberty granted to petitioners to approach respondents. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. dismissal of writ petitions with instructions to consider representation. (Para 5 , 6) |
Order
21/05/2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in the identical situation, a writ petition in the case of Satya Narayan Dhakar V/s The State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18038/2024) has been dismissed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 04.11.2024. He further submits that the order passed by the learned Single Judge has been affirmed by the Hon’ble Division Bench in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.206/2025 (Satya Narayan Dhakar V/s The State of Rajasthan & Ors.) vide order dated 27.02.2025. He, therefore, prays that the interim order passed in the present cases may be vacated.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners though tried to oppose the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondents, however, he is not in a position to refute the submission that the petitioners have been engaged through placement agency and, therefore, as per the j
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
