Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, MR. JUSTICE SUNIL BENIWAL, JJ
STATE – Appellant
Versus
TEJ KARAN AND ORS – Respondent
Judgment
Reserved on : 20/05/2025
Pronounced on : 30 /05/2025
(Per Sunil Beniwa l , J.)
1. Since both the appeals have been filed against the impugned judgment dated 11.12.2000 passed by learned District & Sessions Judge, Jodhpur in Sessions Case No.45/1995, therefore, the same are being decided by this common judgment.
1.1 D.B. Criminal Appeal No.226/2001 has been preferred on behalf of the State against the impugned judgment to the extent of acquittal of the accused namely Tej Karan, Arvind and Rambha Devi.
1.2. D.B. Criminal Appeal No.752/2000 has been preferred to challenge the impugned judgment to the extent of conviction of the accused-appellants.
1.3. The accused-appellants herein have been convicted and sentenced as below vide the aforementioned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 11.12.2000.
| Offence | Sentence | Fine |
| u/S 498-A IPC | 3 Years’ R.I. | Rs.1000/- and in default of which to further undergo one month’s S.I. |
However, vide the impugned judgment, the accused-appellants namely Tej Karan, Arvind and Rambha Devi have been acquitted of the charged offences under Sections 302 and 304-B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
2. During the pendency of the present appeals, Tej Karan (resp
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
