[2023:RJ-JD:40002]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14828/2023 Basantilal S/o Shri Jagdish, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Panmodi, P.s. Rathanjana, Dist. Pratapgarh, Rajasthan. (At Present Lodged At District Jail Pratapgarh).

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

2. Shri Mangilal, Sub-Inspector, P.s. Devgarh, Dist.

Pratapgarh, Rajasthan.

----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14829/2023 Arun S/o Shri Ramchandra, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Panmodi, P.s. Rathanjana, District Pratapgarh, Rajasthan. (At Present Lodged At District Jail Pratapgarh).

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

2. Shri Mangilal, Sub-Inspector, P.s. Devgarh, District Pratapgarh, Rajasthan.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Kumar Gaur For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K. Mehar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

21/11/2023

1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked by way of filing an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. at the instance of accused-petitioners. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:

2. It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioners that the recovered contraband is well below demarcated commercial quantity. No case for the alleged offences is made out against them and they have been made an accused based on conjectures and surmises. Their incarceration is not warranted. There are no factors at play in the case at hand that may work against grant of bail to the accused- petitioners. The embargo contained under Section 37 of NDPS Act is not attracted in this case.

3. Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that the present case is not fit for enlargement of accused on bail.

4. I have considered the submissions made by both the parties and have perused the material available on record. The recovered contraband is well below demarcated commercial quantity. In the given circumstances, the embargo contained under Section 37 of NDPS Act is not attracted in this case. There is high probability that the trial may take long time to conclude. In light of these facts and circumstances, it is deemed suitable to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioners in the present matter.

5. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused- petitioners as named in the cause title shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

(FARJAND ALI),J

651-652-/Devesh/-