SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 18659

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
FARJAND ALI
GOVIND SINGH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 14307 / 2023



[2023:RJ-JD:40593]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14307/2023 Govind Singh S/o Laxman Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Kachhi Basti, Bagwas, Police Station Pratapgarh, Dist.

Pratapgarh. (At Present Lodged In Dist. Jail, Pratapgarh)

----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14308/2023 Chaina Ram S/o Ram Sukh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o House No. 156, Gali No. 04, Gandhipura, Bjs Colony, P.s. Mahamandir, Dist. Jodhpur , Rajasthan. (At Present Lodged In Dist. Jail, Pratapgarh)

----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Punaram Sen for Mr. VK Gaur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

24/11/2023

1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked by way of filing an applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. at the instance of accused-petitioners. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:

S.No. Particulars of the Case

1. FIR Number 446/2023

2. Concerned Police Station Pratapgarh

3. District Pratapgarh
4. Offences alleged in the FIR Under Sections 8/15 of the NDPS Act.
5. Offences added, if any Sections 8/29 of the NDPS Act.
6. Date of passing of impugned order 31.10.2023
order

2. It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioners that the recovered contraband is well below demarcated commercial quantity. No case for the alleged offences is made out against them and they have been made accused based on conjectures and surmises. Their incarceration is not warranted. There are no factors at play in the case at hand that may work against grant of bail to the accused-petitioner. The embargo contained under Section 37 of NDPS Act is not attracted in this case.

3. Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that the present case is not fit for enlargement of accused on bail.

4. Have considered the submissions made by both the parties and have perused the material available on record. The recovered contraband is well below demarcated commercial quantity. In the given circumstances, the embargo contained under Section 37 of NDPS Act is not attracted in this case. There is high probability that the trial may take long time to conclude. In light of these facts and circumstances, it is deemed suitable to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioner in the present matter.

5. Accordingly, the instant bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused- petitioners as named in the cause title shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

(FARJAND ALI),J

92-93 divya/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top