Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
GANESH RAM MEENA
M/s Surgitech Partnership Firm – Appellant
Versus
Nanagram – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. commencement of the appeal process (Para 1) |
| 2. factual background of the lawsuit (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. initial court ruling on injunction (Para 4) |
| 4. arguments against the court's order (Para 5) |
| 5. supporting case law and factual assertions (Para 6 , 7) |
| 6. defense against appeal assertions (Para 8 , 9) |
| 7. analysis of appeal merits (Para 10 , 11) |
| 8. criteria for granting temporary injunction (Para 12 , 13) |
| 9. trinity test criteria for injunction (Para 14) |
| 10. evidence supporting prima facie case (Para 15) |
| 11. evidence of payments and agreements related to the suit. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 12. existence of prima facie case and potential irreparable loss. (Para 25 , 27 , 28) |
| 13. legal standing of agreements with future incidents (Para 26) |
| 14. court ruling favoring the plaintiffs and injunction issuance (Para 30 , 31) |
| 15. final ruling and directive (Para 32) |
Judgment
1. By filing the instant miscellaneous appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 (R) of the Code of Civil Procedure, the plaintiffs- appellants-applicants (for short 'the appellants') have challenged the order dated 30.08.2024 passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge No.10, Jaipur Metropolitan-I (Headquarter Sanganer) (for short 't
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
