Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND, J
M/s R.b. Stone Crusher, Through Its Proprietor, Prabhu Dayal Karol – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through District Collector Jaipur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petitions address the shutting down of stone crushers. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. counsel argues that no fair hearing has been provided. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court supports the principle of natural justice. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court mandates a resolution that respects due process. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. final order gives petitioners the right to seek remedies. (Para 12 , 13) |
Order
27/05/2025
1. Since common question of facts are involved in these writ petitions, hence, all these writ petitions are being decided by this common order.
2. For the sake of convenience, the facts and prayer incorporated in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8282/2025 are taken into consideration.
3. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:-
“That in light of the above-mentioned facts, the Petitioner humbly prays that the present Writ Petition may be admitted, and this Hon’ble Court may pass an order quashing the Notice No.402 dated 16.04.2025 (Annexure-1) issued by the Respondent No.3 and further allow the Petitioner to run his stone crusher without any hurdles.”
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are the stone crushers and they are not
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
