SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 11983

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANAND SHARMA, J
Ankit Repswal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6991/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Rahul Agarwal
For the Respondents: Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP, Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma

The court may grant bail in light of compromise between parties and the prolonged trial process, maintaining legal rights and conditions.

Headnote:This bail application pertains to FIR No. 86/2025 under various offenses including Sections 189(2), 127(2), and 307. The accused-petitioner argues false implication and highlights a compromise. The Public Prosecutor opposes the bail. The Court grants bail conditionally, noting substantial time till trial and the need for co-operation in proceedings. The court does not opine on merits, allowing bail subject to conditions.

Table of Content
1. bail request based on allegations and compromise. (Para 1 , 2)
2. opposition to bail by public prosecutor. (Para 3 , 5)
3. court's consideration of trial duration. (Para 4 , 6)
4. bail granted without judicial opinion on merits. (Para 7)
5. conditions set for bail and consequences for non-compliance. (Para 8 , 9)

Order

10/06/2025

1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in respect of FIR No. 86/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Jhunjhunu for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 127(2), 115(2), 324(4), 109(1) & 307 of BNS.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this matter. Learned counsel further submits that in the FIR, the allegations levelled against him are frivolous. Even otherwise, compromise has been entered into between the parties.

3. Counsel for the complainant is present in Court and he has also not disputed the factum of compromise between the accused-

petitioner and the complainant.

4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner is behind the bars since 09.03.2025. Trial is likely to take considerably long time. Therefore, the accused-petitioner may be allowed to enlarge on bail.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed this bail application.

6. Considered the submissions made at Bar.

7. Taking into consideration, the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

8. Accordingly, this Bail Application is hereby allowed. The accused-petitioner Ankit Repswal S/o Shri Mahendra Singh shall be released on bail in pursuance of FIR No. FIR No. 86/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Jhunjhunu on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- along with two sureties of the like amount. That apart, the accused-petitioner shall also follow the conditions as under:-

(i) He shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case.

(ii) He shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court.

(iii) He shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless his presence is exempted by the trial Court.

9. In case of failure of observance of the conditions, a ground to cancellation of bail would arise.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top