SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 12115

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
FARJAND ALI, J
Pramod Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4142/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Gaurav Singh, Mr. Vikas Bijarnia
For the Respondents: Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP

Anticipatory bail granted under Section 438 Cr.P.C. as offences under IT Act are bailable, emphasizing protection of personal liberty.

Headnote:This judgment discusses the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. due to apprehension of arrest in a case involving alleged offences under the IT Act. The court finds merit in the application, noting that offences under Section 77-B of the IT Act are bailable, concluding that denial of bail would unjustly harm the accused's reputation. The court grants anticipatory bail with conditions, emphasizing the need for the petitioner to cooperate with the police.

Table of Content
1. jurisdiction invoked for anticipatory bail application. (Para 1)
2. opposition to bail based on perceived fitness for grant. (Para 2 , 3)
3. legal basis provided for granting bail under it act. (Para 4 , 5)
4. conditions set for the grant of anticipatory bail. (Para 6)

Order

13/06/2025

1. The jurisdiction of this court has been invoked by way of filing an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C./482 BNSS at the instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:

S.No. Particulars of the Case
1. FIR Number 137/2024
2. Concerned Police Station Bilara
3. District Jodhpur
4. Offences alleged in the FIR Under Sections 67 , 67A, 67B of IT Act
5. Offences added, if any -
6. Date of passing of impugned order 19.03.2025

2. Having apprehension of being arrested in the afore-

mentioned matter, the petitioner has prayed for anticipatory bail on the ground that no case for the alleged offences is made out against him and his incarceration is not warranted. There are no factors at play in the case at hand that may work against grant of anticipatory bail to the accused-petitioner and he has been made an accused based on conjectures and surmises.

3. Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application and submitted that the present case is not fit for grant of anticipatory bail.

4. I have considered the submissions made by both the parties and have perused the material available on record. As per Section 77-B of the Information Technology Act , offence punishable up to three years are bailable and therefore, any apprehension dehors the statutory provision would certainly cause incalculable harm to the self-esteem and reputation of the accused.

5. Considering the over all facts and circumstances of the case, it is deemed suitable to grant the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in the present matter.

6. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner in connection with the FIR, details of which have been given in tabular form above, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

(FARJAND ALI),J

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top