Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
FARJAND ALI, J
Smt. Santosh – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to trial court judgment (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. analysis and findings on acquittal and probation (Para 3) |
| 3. final dismissal of revision petitions (Para 4 , 5) |
Order
ORDER RESERVED ON ::: 19/05/2025 ORDER PRONOUNCED ON ::: 17/06/2025 BY THE COURT :-
1. These two revision petitions have been preferred challenging the judgment dated 05.12.2006, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Sujangarh in Criminal Original Case No.394/1994, whereby although the accused-respondents Parshu Ram and Nand Kishore were convicted for committing offences under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code ( IPC ), they were acquitted of the charges under Sections 452 and 354 IPC . Furthermore, instead of imposing a sentence, the learned Trial Court extended to them the benefit of probation.
2. A challenge has also been made to the judgment dated 18.12.2017 passed by the Court of Appeal, whereby three appeals being Criminal Appeal No.08/2017, 09/2017 & 10/2017—one filed by the State of Rajasthan, one by the complainant-petitioner, and one by the accused-respondents—were jointly disposed of.
2.1. At the outset, it is pertinent to mention that Respondent No.2 in Revision Petition No. 37
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
