Back
2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 19144
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J
Dr. Priyanka Choubisa – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
Civil Writ Petition No. 12217/2025|S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18889/2024
For the Petitioners: Ms. Varsha Bissa
For the Respondents: Dr. Praveen Khandelwal, AAG with Mr. Piyush Bhandari
Judicial consistency is upheld through the application of precedent in employment-related disputes.
Headnote:(A) The controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by a judgment rendered by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18889/2024 (Dr. Jwala Prasad Kaloshia & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.), decided on 21.05.2025. (Paras 2, 4)
(B) The respondents were unable to refute the petitioners' submissions, indicating a decisive affirmation of the earlier ruling.
Facts of the case:
The petitioners, employed at various Government Colleges, sought relief comparable to a prior judgment in a similar matter.
Findings of Court:
The writ petition was disposed of in accordance with the prior judgment, highlighting the continuity of judicial precedence.
Issues: The main issue addressed was whether the current case mirrored the previous ruling concerning employment rights and benefits.
Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed the application of the previous ruling, showing adherence to judicial consistency and respect for existing judgments.
Result: The present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Dr. Jwala Prasad Kaloshia (supra).
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. material facts of the petition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. decision based on previous judgment. (Para 4) |
Order
03/07/2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by a judgment rendered by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18889/2024 (Dr. Jwala Prasad Kaloshia & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.), decided on 21.05.2025.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents is not in a position to refute the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners.
4. In view of the submissions made before this Court, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Dr. Jwala Prasad Kaloshia (supra).
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
