SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 13423

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
Rekha Borana, J
Renu Chugh – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
Civil Writ Petition No. 12504/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Vishal Jangid
For the Respondents: Mr. N.K. Mehta, Dy.G.C.

Incumbents not joining after promotion may opt to forego their promotion.

Headnote:(A) Relevant law includes the Rules of 2021 concerning promotions and options to forego promotion.

(B) Key legal principle established: Incumbents not joining after a promotion can opt to forego it

(C)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner challenged transfer and expressed willingness to forego promotion.

(D)

Findings of Court:
The court agrees with a previous judgment allowing forego options. (E)

Issues: The court addressed the legality of promotion forego options. (F)

Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated its earlier decision allowing options to forego promotion. (G)

Result: The writ petition is disposed of in terms similar to a prior case.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's transfer challenged; willing to forego promotion. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court agrees with prior judgment allowing forego options. (Para 4 , 5)
3. writ petition disposed similarly to previous case. (Para 6 , 7)

Order

11/07/2025

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the posting/transfer order dated 12.04.2025 (Annex.2) has been challenged in the present petition vide which the petitioner was transferred from Bhainsroadgarh, District Chittorgarh to Keshavpura, District Bundi after being promoted from Vice Principal to Principal but she is now ready to forego her promotion.

2. Counsel submits that the petitioner may be permitted to forego her promotion in light of the judgment delivered by this Court in a bunch of cases led by Jasvinder Singh Thiara Vs.

State of Rajasthan & Anr.; S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8637/2025 (decided on 26.05.2025).

3. Learned counsel Mr. N.K. Mehta, Dy.G.C. appearing for respondent Department raises an objection to the above submission and submits that the petitioner had never opted to forego her promotion and the present writ petition has also been filed challenging the transfer order only. Hence, she cannot be permitted at this stage to forego the promotion.

4. After hearing the counsels, this Court is of the opinion that as this Court has already taken a view in Jasvinder Singh Thiara’s case (supra) to the effect that any incumbent who did not join in pursuance to the posting order after promotion, would be entitled to exercise the option of forego the promotion, the present petitioner too deserves the same treatment.

5. In Jasvinder Singh Thiara’s case (supra), this Court while disposing of the writ petitions directed as under:

“44. The writ petitions are therefore, disposed of with the following directions:

(i) The petitioners shall be at liberty to file an application in writing, exercising their option to forego the promotion, within a period of 15 days from now.

(ii) The application shall be filed in writing clearly indicating the option to forego the promotion. The consequences of the said exercise of option, in terms of Rule 33 of the Rules of 2021 , would follow.

(iii) The petitioners shall, along with their application, be under an obligation to file a specific undertaking to the effect that they would be governed by Rule 33 of the Rules of 2021 and would not raise any grievance qua the same, in future.

(iv) The petitioners shall also be under an obligation to file a specific undertaking to the effect that they will not claim any monetary or other benefit of the promotional post on which they had joined in pursuance to order dated 24.01.2025.

(v) The petitioners shall further undertake that any benefit, if any, availed by them because of their joining on the promotional post, shall be refunded back by them whenever called upon to do so by the respondents-

Authorities.

(vi) The decision on the applications as filed by the petitioners would be taken by the competent Authority positively within a period of four weeks of filing of the applications.

(vii) Till the applications as filed by the petitioners are decided, the petitioners shall continue on their present place of posting deeming them to be working on the post of ‘Vice Principal’, as they were working before being promoted.

(viii) Those petitioners who have been relieved after the orders of posting been passed, would also be entitled to file an application in writing to forego their promotion and the said applications shall also be decided in terms of the above directions.

The said petitioners shall, till the date their application is decided, be entitled to be reverted back to their original place of posting i.e. on the post which they were working before being promoted.

Needless to observe that they would be reverted only if the said seat is vacant as of date.

ix) Those petitioners who, after having been provided the place of posting, joined in pursuance to the same, would also be entitled to move an app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top