Table of Content
1. conviction upheld while appealing for sentence reconsideration. (Para 1 , 2)
2. no patent illegality found in prior convictions. (Para 4)
3. sentence modification to account for age and duration of custody. (Para 5 , 6)
4. judicial review of sentence based on mitigating circumstances. (Para 7 , 8)
5. final order regarding sentence and implications. (Para 9 , 10)

Order

15/07/2025

1. The Petitioner has made challenge to the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 05.02.2007, passed by the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pokran in Criminal Regular Case No.262/2003, whereby he was convicted and sentenced to suffer imprisonment in following terms:-

Punishable under Section Section 279 IPC Section 337 IPC Section 304-A IPC

Sentence, Fine and default sentence Six month’s RI, fine of Rs.500/- and in default to further undergo 7 days SI Six month’s RI, fine of Rs.500/- and in default to further undergo 7 days SI One year’s RI, fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default to further undergo one month’s SI

A challenge is also made to the judgment dated 29.08.2008, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jaisalmer in Criminal Appeal No.03/2007, whereby the appeal file

Click Here to Read the rest of this document