2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 19176
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
Sudesh Bansal, J
Santra Saini – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 738/2025
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Prakash Chand Yadav
For the Respondents: Ms. Manju Dave, PP
The Court reaffirms the fundamental right to life and liberty under Article 21, directing the petitioners to seek protection through designated authorities without evaluating the marriage's validity.
Headnote:This judgment pertains to petitions for protection under Article 21 of the Constitution concerning threats to life and liberty stemming from familial disapproval of a marriage. The Court, while recognizing the right to life as fundamental, directs petitioners to approach the appointed Nodal Officer for redress without delving into the marriage's legality. The order maintains the integrity of any ongoing legal proceedings, emphasizing the need for safety amidst external pressures. The culmination of the ruling underscores that the petition is disposed with necessary rights reiterated for the protection of the petitioners.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners addressed factual discrepancies regarding documentation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioners seeking protection under threat due to their marriage. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court relies on precedent for rights protection without affirming marriage. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. order provides a procedural avenue for grievances while clarifying ongoing legal standings. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
Order
24/06/2025
1. Petitioners have moved an application to wavie the defects in respect of father's name of petitioner No.1-Santra Saini.
2. Counsel for petitioners submits that father's name of Santra Saini in Aadhar Card is Mulridhar Saini but in the marksheet of Class VIII, his name is Mulchand Saini, both are one and same.
3. In that view of matter, the defect pointed out by the Office is waived.
4. Petitioners have preferred instant petition for issuance of necessary directions to official-respondents to provide adequate security and protection to them on the ground that they are facing grave threat of their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.
5. Counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners are major and enterered into registered marriage and in order to live happily and peacefully, they are seeking protection qua private respondents, who are not happy with the relationship of petitioners.
6. Pursuant the judgment of the Apex Court in case of Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India [(2018)10 SCC 1] and of this court in Bajrang Lal Sharma v. State of Rajasthan , SB Cr. Miscellaneous Petition No.2/2019 decided on 4-1-2019, the State Government through Director General of Police issued a Circular dated 18-1-2019 and appointed Nodel Officer at every Police Station in the state of Rajasthan for ventilation of grievances of newly married couple, including for adequate protection. Life and liberty is fundamental right of every citizen being part of Article 21 of the Constitution of India , petitioners deserve protection of their life and liberty in accordance with law.
7. In view of above, however, this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction is not inclined to enter into examining the validity of marriage/ legality of relationship of parties, therefore does not render any affirmation of legality and validity of the status of parties, under which they are living together, but keeping in mind the proposition of law set forth by the Apex Court in catena of judgments and in order to protect fundamental rights of parties for their life and liberty, guaranteed under the Constitution, this petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioners to approach the concerned Nodal Officer for ventilation of their grievances.
8. In case petitioners move any application, it is expected from the concerned Nodal Officer to take necessary action for not allowing to illegally hinder in peaceful life and liberty of petitioners by private respondents, who are not agreeable to the relationship of petitioners, but after verifying the fact, if required.
9. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter.
10. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any stand disposed of.